{"id":6795,"date":"2026-09-16T14:53:31","date_gmt":"2026-09-16T14:53:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lumeamara.online\/?p=6795"},"modified":"2026-09-16T14:53:32","modified_gmt":"2026-09-16T14:53:32","slug":"abortion-bans-make-evidence-based-medicine-impossible-in-some-cases-new-report-says","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lumeamara.online\/?p=6795","title":{"rendered":"Abortion bans make \u2018evidence-based medicine\u2019 impossible in some cases, new report says"},"content":{"rendered":"
People protest in support of abortion access in Scottsdale, Arizona, on 14 April 2024. Photograph: Rebecca Noble\/Reuters<\/figcaption>
People protest in support of abortion access in Scottsdale, Arizona, on 14 April 2024. Photograph: Rebecca Noble\/Reuters<\/figcaption>Abortion bans make \u2018evidence-based medicine\u2019 impossible in some cases, new report says<\/p>\n

Some 41 states restrict abortions, a \u2018core component\u2019 of maternal fetal practice, high-risk pregnancy non-profit says<\/p>\n

Maternal fetal specialists should see abortion care as a \u201ccore component\u201d of their practice in states where laws restrict abortion, according to a new special statement from the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM)<\/p>\n

Some 41 states ban abortion at some point in pregnancy, and these legal restrictions make it difficult or impossible for clinicians to practice \u201cstandard-of-care, evidence-based medicine\u201d, the report, released on Tuesday, says<\/p>\n

The Dobbs decision made it even more challenging for patients<\/a> to access abortion care in the US, as more restrictions went into effect in some states. Deaths from ectopic pregnancies nearly doubled between 2020 and 2025, a ProPublica analysis found, and later-abortion providers in haven states report that patients are showing up \u201clater and sicker\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cIn some ways, the practice of maternal-fetal medicine is inseparable from family<\/a> planning and abortion care,\u201d said Justin Lappen, chair of SMFM\u2019s reproductive health committee and a co-author of the statement<\/p>\n

In July 2021, Kate Dineen was about 33 weeks pregnant<\/a> and giddy with excitement. Her husband was finally able to join her for his first ultrasound of their second child, after Covid restrictions were loosened. But then the room went quiet; the silence stretched on as the ultrasound tech lingered over images of the baby\u2019s brain. Soon, after an MRI and consultation with a pediatric neurologist, they learned that their son had suffered a catastrophic stroke in utero, and his chances of surviving even the pregnancy were poor.<\/p>\n

Dineen remembers asking, \u201cWhat are my options?\u201d One of the specialists said, \u201cYou may still be able to explore termination \u2013 if you\u2019re able to travel.\u201d Dineen was stunned. She lived in Massachusetts, where abortions were banned after 24 weeks except in specific cases \u2013 and her case didn\u2019t qualify for an exception, she learned. The maternal fetal team at her hospital offered to link her to a later abortion clinic in Washington DC, Dineen said.<\/p>\n

She and her husband rushed to find childcare for their 18-month-old son and made the long drive to Maryland, where they stayed multiple nights, to receive care<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019re just so grateful to get the compassionate care that we needed and deserved, and should have been able to get closer to home,\u201d Dineen said. If she\u2019d been able to get the abortion in Massachusetts, it would\u2019ve been much easier to grieve and find closure, she said. \u201cInstead, our lives were turned completely upside down,\u201d she said. \u201cI feel like I barely survived it.\u201d<\/p>\n

Maternal fetal specialists are at the forefront of many reproductive health decisions \u2013 including genetic diagnosis, ultrasound diagnoses and screening for anomalies, and complicated maternal medical conditions. That\u2019s why guidance from professional societies on supporting abortion is key, so providers may expand their roles and \u201ccontinue to provide as much care as possible\u201d said Lappen<\/p>\n

The statement highlights what can be done on the individual level when it comes to caring for patients, and it points to the role that specialists play in \u201cinstitutional advocacy\u201d to make sure their health systems have plans to support patients ahead of time, he said<\/p>\n

\u201cIt\u2019s really important for health systems, for hospitals, to be able to create safe systems of care and to understand what the state reproductive health legal landscape looks like,\u201d Lappen said. That way, they can create the most comprehensive and expansive systems to provide care, he argued<\/p>\n

It\u2019s imperative to set guidelines now, before emergencies arise, Lappen said. \u201cWhen someone\u2019s facing a really significant pregnancy complication, where decision-making has to happen in a critically acute or rapid time frame, that\u2019s not the best time to get on the phone with the lawyers.\u201d<\/p>\n

Providers and health systems should \u201cexpand access to abortion care to the legal limit allowed by state law\u201d to provide the most comprehensive care to patients, the statement says. That means understanding the exceptions to those laws and how providers may offer care in those scenarios, which can often be complicated to interpret but are no less important, Lappen said<\/p>\n

\u201cThe law is intended to be sort of black and white,\u201d said Lappen. \u201cAnd healthcare and physiology and pregnancy complications live in the shades of gray.\u201d<\/p>\n

Dineen, who is now an advocate and board member of Reproductive Equity Now, said it\u2019s \u201creally wonderful\u201d for the medical society to highlight the key role that abortion care plays in maternal-fetal medicine<\/p>\n

Providers \u201cshould be exploiting exceptions to the fullest extent in ban states\u201d, she said. At the same time, she added, \u201cI wouldn\u2019t want this to be interpreted as \u2018bans with exceptions work.\u2019\u201d Maternal-fetal specialists can also advocate against abortion bans in order to serve all of their patients, she said<\/p>\n

It\u2019s a \u201cmisconception\u201d that adding exceptions to abortion bans means that patients who need abortions will be able to access them, Dineen said. \u201cA ban with exceptions often functions just as a ban.\u201d Even though she believes her providers wanted to give her the standard of care, and even though Massachusetts did carve out exceptions, she still had to travel hundreds of miles to get an abortion.<\/p>\n

In Massachusetts, she said, \u201cwe uniquely are able to demonstrate why bans with exceptions don\u2019t result in patients being able to access care.\u201d<\/p>\n

In 2022, after Dineen and others testified about how restrictions kept them from medically necessary care, Massachusetts legislators expanded the abortion exception to include \u201cgrave fetal diagnoses\u201d. It was an improvement, Dineen said, but some patients were still not getting care. Now, Massachusetts is removing the 24-week ban, which means all patients will have access to standard reproductive care.<\/p>\n

The law \u201cunties the hands of our world-class MFMs and other providers here to ensure that these deeply personal medical decisions are made between the patient and their provider at any point in pregnancy\u201d, Dineen said<\/p>\n

Maternal-fetal specialists in Massachusetts played an important role in changing the law, Dineen said<\/p>\n

\u201cThat has been a real game-changer, having their expertise guiding the discussion again,\u201d she said<\/p>\n

Explore more on these topicsShare
\nReuse this content<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Some 41 states restrict abortions, a \u2018core component\u2019 of maternal fetal practice, high-risk pregnancy non-profit says<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":6797,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[22],"tags":[595,1651,1652,385,514],"class_list":["post-6795","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-pregnancy","tag-abortion","tag-bans","tag-evidencebased","tag-make","tag-medicine"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/lumeamara.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6795","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/lumeamara.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/lumeamara.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lumeamara.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lumeamara.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=6795"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/lumeamara.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6795\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6796,"href":"https:\/\/lumeamara.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6795\/revisions\/6796"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lumeamara.online\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/6797"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/lumeamara.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=6795"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lumeamara.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=6795"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/lumeamara.online\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=6795"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}